-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 30/09/15 07:42 AM, hasufell wrote: > * libressl has to conflict with openssl
Right now libressl exports many of the same symbols as openssl right? What if it didn't -- that is, we forced a symver map with a libressl prefix on all symbols? That would ensure anything built against libressl would not b0rk if openssl was loaded, or more specifically, if something else was loaded that was built against and links to openssl. This wouldn't need any rdep patching at all, and would ensure symbol collisions between the two projects would not occur. It doesn't explicitly enable side-by-side installation but it would help ensure things built for one project wouldn't use symbols from the other's lib expecting compatibility and randomly fail. ...or am I mis-understanding the major issue with the libressl/openssl conflict? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlYMC3EACgkQAJxUfCtlWe34nwD+N+4s1ZFVLS8CGokYOEa64U6o EINP0tsAe2EyA/cpy6oBANoIyxf7bfPStLPofV1ZW7/7+z3DsmtSqYztsU6dptmz =oAIp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
