On 29/09/2015 16:29, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount >> -a. This is being dropped because it is util-linux specific and >> not compatible with busybox. > > Does this have any actual end-user impact? AFAIK, using the -O > switch was 'just added' by us originally (i think to reduce the > explicit listing of the different fs types or otherwise simplify the > init script code) right? I'm just wondering if this paragraph is > actually necessary or not..
As a user, that para in the news makes me ask "how does this affect me?". I have to go read man pages and init scripts to find out. Perhaps this: Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount -a, because it is util-linux specific and not compatible with busybox. This only affects mounts with "_netdev" listed under options in /etc/fstab. Such systems should use "noauto" and/or "nofail" as described above. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
