On 9/9/15 5:48 PM, hasufell wrote: > There was a tracker on bugzilla about it at some point, but people > didn't care enough, so I stopped filing bugs. Neither the gnome team > nor QA had a strong enough opinion to enforce consistency here over > the whole tree.
Looks like that was <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420493> . I'm not sure whether the underlying issue was enforcement, or just handling various use cases. Similar situation with qt/qt4/qt5 seems to confirm to me that it's not whims that make people not follow the policy, but real needs and use cases. Quotes from above bug: > You really have not addressed all the situations here. > Yes I know there may be situations where the proposed solutions are > not sufficient. Also, most blocking bugs seem to be resolved as WONTFIX/WORKSFORME/INVALID. FWIW I do care. For now responses on this thread seem to recommend (or be at least OK with) adding gtk3 USE flag to www-client/chromium . If there's an alternative solution endorsed by GNOME or QA team that would make progress on <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=559378> possible, I'd just switch to that solution. Paweł
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
