On 07/06/2015 12:42 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Alec Warner wrote: >> Its difficult to make a large change like "all commits require review", >> particularly for long-time contributors who are expecting to move quickly. > > I think it's a character flaw (maybe hubris due to lack of experience > and/or ignorance?) to lack the humility to say that I would prefer my > commits to be reviewed by peers. >
I would love my commits to be reviewed, but I usually don't feel like reviewing anyone else's. That's... not uncommon. So what it comes down to is that I would rather have my work reviewed by no one and get committed rather than be reviewed by no one and sit in a review queue for months or years. And while it's not quite as good, the stabilization process serves a similar purpose.
