On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 06:49:24PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > William Hubbs wrote: > > It may take some work, but I do not think we could reach a point > > where nothing could be changed. > > > > Remember that, unlike cvs, every git clone, by default, has all of the > > history of the repository, so all we would have to do is find another > > place to host the repository and push it there. > > I think that's too simplistic. Proprietary systems are a slippery > slope. And the problem with GitHub Inc. in particular isn't their > technology at all, but their processes and the mindset they promote, > because the processes and mindset are locked to their platform.
The only thing locked to their platform really is the web ui or their api. Even pull requests really aren't, because git has the "git request-pull" command. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
