El sáb, 11-04-2015 a las 21:50 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: > Hi all, > > the debate about arches, keywording and stabilization procedures is > coming up again. > > People have told me that the whole debate seems to turn into some sort > of arch-team bashing. That is definitely not the plan. Also, > supporting many different types of hardware is actually one of the > strong points of Gentoo. > > So, it would be absolutely great to have more feedback from the arch > teams, especially suggestions > * how to improve procedures, > * where you see the main problems, and > * where you don't see problems... > > Please make your voice heard. Noone wants to overrule an active team. > > Cheers, > Andreas > > PS. I've ommitted amd64, hppa, and arm from the manual CC list because > these are the stable arches I'm definitely not worried about. > Obviously feedback is appreciated anyway. >
I think we need a common place to share all the scripts we are needing to use to: - Stabilize a bunch of packages from different bug reports - Stabilize big lists from *one* bug report - All the bug handling (unCC arches when needed, close the bug when it's the last arch) - The scripts running "repoman full" on the stable candidates to report if they are not ok due to missing deps. - ... And, ideally, that multiple script should be unified if possible once we can see them all in that repo and take the best from them :)
