On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > El lun, 16-02-2015 a las 06:39 -0500, Mike Frysinger escribió: > [...] > > Anyway, wouldn't have been much more useful for all to spend the effort > used in remove the package on simply fixing the header? :/ >
Yeah, let's not bring up the last time somebody tried to do that without any intention of malice that I could detect. The complaints were fairly "euthusiastic." For other kinds of issues I agree that being less invasive is better. I do agree that providing notice to the dev when making QA actions of any kind should be standard practice, as brought up by Markos. -- Rich
