07.02.2015 23:12, hasufell пишет: > In addition... there is no work that needs to be done that has not > already been done, other than banning an eclass or stating that it is > the way to go.
How would you do that without breaking all user apps? Clearly - by slowly migrating away from it and do not use it in newer ebuilds. That's what is done here, so what do you complain on? > If the eclass is going to be banned, then there is a deprecation phase > with a news items for users and devs will just stop using it. If it is > the way to go, then nothing has to change (except disallowing ebuilds > that break consistency). > You are making it sound like there is some huge work to be done. There > isn't. And no one has to step up to change the current situation, except > the council. That's clearly up to eclass owner, which is games team. If you think that this is not huge work - deprecating eclass, moving all ebuilds from it and carring that no breakages will happen - then - step up and do this work, as was already suggested. "Talk is cheap, show me the code" (c) Linux Torvalds -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
