Am Samstag, 27. September 2014, 15:08:57 schrieb Michał Górny: > Dnia 2014-09-23, o godz. 16:52:56 > > "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfri...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): > > > > Modified: ChangeLog perl-module.eclass > > > > Log: > > > > Remove support for EAPI 1, 2, 3 in perl-module.eclass (no packages > > > > left in the tree) > > > > > > This could have used some kind of heads-up. Now I'm getting a lot of > > > metadata generation errors due to overlays still using those EAPIs. > > > > True, this could have been done in more elegant ways, i.e. first an ugly > > deprecation warning for some time. (Usually we don't care too much about > > overlays. Here, it's g-cpan that concerns me.) > > > > Would it still make sense to do that? > > (i.e. re-allow 123 for a while and add a warning?) > > Yes, that would reduce the amount of breakage e.g. due to sunrise > ebuilds using that. Not that I expect people to actually fix the > ebuilds but I'd have a little less chatter during cache regen :).
OK now there's just a big fat ewarn that support will be removed on 1/Nov. Gives everyone a month time to fix the ebuilds; then we can remove support and clean up the eclass. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
