On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:41:34 +0000 (UTC)
Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote:
> The idea is to act "as usual", just to skip unnecessary phases...

So someone adds optional selinux support to a package, and then you end
up with selinux being "on", despite not having it, and then another
package depends upon your package with [selinux], and the dependency is
mistakenly treated as met...

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to