El mié, 23-07-2014 a las 14:33 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:06:07 +0200 > Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Maybe this could be solved by having two kinds of revisions: > > - One would rebuild all as usually (for example, -r1...) > > - The other one would only regenerate VDB and wouldn't change the > > installed files (for example, -r1.1) > > > > But I am not sure if it could be viable from a "technical" point of > > view :( > > This in no way solves the problem. Consider the following course of > events: > > User installs foo-1.1-r1 > Developer makes foo-1.1-r1.1 > foo-1.1* is removed from the tree > User syncs >
Isn't there a way for PMs to know that they need to not rebuild full if user has 1.1-r1 *installed* in his system and pretends to update to -r1.1?
