Dnia 2014-07-03, o godz. 09:05:47 Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> napisał(a):
> Jonathan Callen posted on Thu, 03 Jul 2014 03:05:46 -0400 as excerpted: > > > I did, however test when a package installs two (different) regular > > files into paths that end up symlinked, and found that portage does > > break in that case (as the only sensible option at that point is to > > fail, as something will be lost in either case). > > Indeed, and good point. > > I guess at that point it's basically a pkg-collision, except that it's in > a single package instead of two different packages. Too bad a package > can't block itself and thus handle it the way different packages blocking > each other handle that case! =;^) > > That's why symlinking both lib64 and lib32 to lib isn't a particularly > good idea! =;^) Symlinking anything to lib wasn't ever a particularly good idea. We will spend a lot of effort fixing that (see the SYMLINK_LIB=no bug [1]). [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506276 -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature