-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 30/06/14 09:25 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:01 AM, William Hubbs
> <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:04:54AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:36 AM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> This is still too vague for me. If it's expected to be
>>>> short-term, then it can as well just land in ~arch.
>>> 
>>> A package that hasn't been tested AT ALL doesn't belong in
>>> ~arch. Suppose the maintainer is unable to test some aspect of
>>> the package, or any aspect of the package?  Do we want it to
>>> break completely for ~arch?  In that event, nobody will run
>>> ~arch for that package, and then it still isn't getting
>>> tested.
>> 
>> I'm not saying that we should just randomly throw something into
>> ~arch without testing it, but ~arch users are running ~arch with
>> the understanding that their systems will break from time to time
>> and they are expected to be able to deal with it when/if it
>> happens. ~arch is not a second stable branch.
> 
> Agree 100%.  I'm taking about masking things that HAVEN'T BEEN
> TESTED AT ALL.  The maintainer knows that they compile, and that is
> it.  Or maybe they tested it in a very limited set of circumstances
> but know that other untested circumstances are important to the
> users and they have definite plans to get them tested.
> 


Here's a great example of this -- dev-libs/nss-3.16-r1 is p.masked by
me for testing, because when I converted it to multilib i needed to
change the way it does some internal ABI determination tests, and
although I know it does work fine on multilib-amd64 and (non-multilib)
x86, I am not confident without more testing that it will work for
cross-compiles or other non-multilib arches.  As such, it -is- in the
tree, but I've masked it until I can test it myself in these
circumstances or find someone else that can do it for me.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlOxgJ8ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPC8zAD/XwulPJp4f3xNFe4ZP7gE+kmp
qhmdvJjUFyWW8j1dTHMA/jFc/mrH/dnyq/MJWBlUbEFY3ccebpLw/8C6/IaSeXw4
=iKL1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to