Dnia 2014-06-22, o godz. 11:41:01 "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfri...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> Also people familiar with Perl have voiced doubts if we should meddle with
> the
> perl-module CFLAGS and LDFLAGS at all, maybe making these changes conditional
> on something like I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING. Hoping for comments.
Making them conditional would make them pointless.
Also, how about fixing CC and CXX? That's more important to me than
some disrespected CFLAGS :P.
> Detail discussion and test results follows below the patch.
>
> =======================================
>
> Index: perl-module.eclass
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/perl-module.eclass,v
> retrieving revision 1.139
> diff -u -B -r1.139 perl-module.eclass
> --- perl-module.eclass 30 Mar 2014 19:25:14 -0000 1.139
> +++ perl-module.eclass 22 Jun 2014 09:35:16 -0000
> @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@
> --libdoc= \
> --destdir="${D}" \
> --create_packlist=0 \
> + --config "optimize=${CFLAGS}" \
> + --config "lddlflags=-shared ${LDFLAGS}" \
Tadaam, you just broke Darwin like we did! Look at [1] for some clues,
though perl may need different values.
[1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513664#c7
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
