-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/30/2014 01:39 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> configs should have never gotten into genkernel in the first place.
> it's each kernel pkg (or even version) that owns a valid config of
> itself.
> I am part of genkernel@ but I have no will nor time to fix it. And
> when I have, I'd rather work on genkernel-next, that comes with a much
> more readable initramfs code (that I managed to rewrite myself).
> 
> Wiping the whole config files has been on my agenda for very long time 
> already.

And replaced by what?  defconfig? allmodconfig?

- -Zero
> 
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Ben Kohler <bkoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> As nice at it sounds to just DROP these configs, that option is not really
>>> feasible considering the way we currently use genkernel in our handbook.
>>> Relying on the kernel's own defconfig, "genkernel all" will NOT produce the
>>> same mostly-usable-on-any-hardware result that we now rely on.
>>
>> Considering that the configs are more generically useful than
>> genkernel, having them separately maintained sort-of makes sense.
>> Then genkernel is a kernel build/install/initramfs tool, not a config
>> management tool.
>>
>> I'd stick them someplace where any dev can get to them, and separate
>> them from the genkernel functional code base.
>>
>> As far as who takes care of them goes - I suggest that this stuff
>> comes out of the devmanual unless somebody steps up to take care of
>> them.  Those who take care of them become those who want to keep them
>> around.  You can't toss out a tool and ask for it to be a
>> recommendation but point to others that you think need to maintain its
>> configuration.
>>
>> Rich
>>
> 
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTiMbcAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKWGAP/3PwUkUTqUIQrORooQv4ZTR8
CX/oI8jmhA8o+3QELpti8JY0qP8rak45w++7Hofyg5MD8UimS3jhUr5jWwS3gGyS
K/SWIPlDsSDIrp0hQO4oTqT2zw3m1C/A+zpdElF5wtNZrEsF86rcn1CeO9ZKMUUq
pet3qjPHhzOtts9QoyejIyTtm+iIzig7RlbuIYQmf44C8I0ZHhXnDiKfLc8TFLYE
N0gpm9GzMpIP60hbRRAKfCtNqjG0y3XvJJSgHm+tdlx6+1dQXkSJjrkvMvI/L7gH
oLFqT8TYpHf9aMkr32Hy2LY/b1dwDZqqjXozB+/Sgdgvh7XWtALLJO6WJovuVst5
Bhv1ADlBA8w9FQLqwi0QMapqf94lslmqfr4QEmWz/QURv8CM2gSsTqfqouxlI+HB
QPWzM/pzyAi3UW8nP7lTfC96SrSoy8Vsop2/CxJxzUW0y3VGoRi3Ckuo38MXKiXI
aHkKL+UisOWbbPWtU6TphRrdmphEkICOSvIVzRFA84I9hIgQF6EPic2TyY/+G2xz
gKORB0BeTA2SnOjZ3S5uJClHViVugCepGVpy2J1WkTIb0sBJwchV8t5ssN1Aa+Vm
9uAXkDCK0tw8jK3pgsa+zweBA22LYIisk3TYq27+zOh11uso0kE6XXT/sunQZKOz
/j2iAIh3/rhC4Y/OMNal
=hNQF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to