On Tue, 13 May 2014 19:11:18 +0200 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Dnia 2014-05-13, o godz. 09:28:49 > Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > > I tried network-sandbox — this is a disaster. It brokes distcc > > completely since distcc client can't connect to remote servers (and > > even to a local one if any). > > Calling something a disaster just because it breaks one thing is > unpleasant at least. > > This is a corner case with no good solution at the moment. Though it is > entirely doable to make FEATURES=distcc and FEATURES=network-sandbox > conflict, or the former disable the latter implicitly. As Rich noted, > we do not enable distcc by default so there's no reason why we can't > enable conflicting options by default. Probably best to make FEATURES=distcc disable network-sandbox then. People enabling it are explicitly saying they want to access the network. -- Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
