El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 22:25 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > On 08/04/14 22:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 16:14 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > >> It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs, > >> installing ebuilds, and reporting bugs about possible > >> broken .png files within packages. > >> The problem is broken IDAT lenght, an error that libpng15 still > >> gracefully ignored, but libpng16 no longer ignores. > >> > >> The bug, http://bugs.gentoo.org/468386 > >> List created by Tobias at 2013 May, > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=347306 > >> <mailto:klaus...@gentoo.org> > >> > >> This has been discussed on the ML before, and most important packages > >> got already fixed, but there are packages still > >> left. Any help addressing the issue is welcome, and I'm sending this > >> mail in hopes people will see packages on the lists > >> that intrest them, and fix them. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Samuli > >> <mailto:klaus...@gentoo.org> > >> > > If there exists a tool that detects that broken png files, maybe a QA > > portage check (like the one used to detect broken .desktop files) could > > be added to help to detect and fix the problematic images :/ > > > > > > Pretty good idea, there is the script in python, and Portage is python, > maybe it can be adopted somehow. > > The script is at, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466190#c11 > > - Samuli >
Probably we will need to open a bug report, do you prefer to report that one or should I? ;)