On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:16:42 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > From my limited look at the code I've done so far in the small bit > > of repoman work on the Portage team, as detailed in another mail I > > just sent to you on this ML, I wouldn't consider it as a problem > > just now. > > > > We for example have /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/eapi.py to easily > > deal with it, it's just that such checks would drop in that file and > > across the Portage source code when the versions listed in those > > checks are no longer used. It's currently reasonable to have this > > amount of checks, but imagine it growing to what you would need for > > 10 versions; that'd be a different story, but perhaps it is too > > early to wonder about this now. > > Removing EAPIs doesn't help you: you still need to be able to > uninstall things. There aren't much checks left if you only need to cover that. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
