On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:04:19 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski <st...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Your "suggestion" was expanding the "arm" keyword to "armv4-linux",
> "armv5-linux", "armv6-linux", "armv6-hardfloat-linux",
> "armv7-softfp-linux", "armv7-hardfloat-linux",
> "armv7-hardfloat-uclibc-linux" - that is nowhere near a good solution.

We've ran over the reasons and they have appeared as fit for this idea.

It can be prejudged as "nowhere near a good solution"; but for it to
actually be that, it would need solid reasoning that people agree on.

Reasoning is also needed to be able to figure out which conditions are
fit for another solution; that way, the other solutions could be shaped
with the help of that feedback to make the other solutions better.

> The /dev/null comment was about wanting others to do the work and not
> contributing anything more than (imo) a stupid idea

The idea moves work from one place to another, which yields the same
amount of work; your work statement seems like another topic, which you
are making basic assumptions on. Solutions to the stated actual problem
are neglected, as more time for research and consideration is needed.

To get on the topic of your work statement; consider that one can find
7 people whom each have one arm configuration much faster than one can
find 1 person that has all of them.

> if you aren't willing to put in the work, don't expect others to.

If you are unwilling to work towards solutions, don't expect others to.

> And yes, I see what you mean now re: my reply seeming off - it would
> seem when I hit group reply, for some reason, Evolution is putting
> Peter Stuge into the CC, and not Tom Wijsman (despite hitting group
> reply from your email.  Maybe there should have been more testing of
> Gnome 3.8 before it was stabled on x86...

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html

-- 
With kind regards,

Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer

E-mail address  : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to