On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 9. November 2013, 02:19:32 schrieb Ben de Groot:
>> On 8 November 2013 08:55, Rémi Cardona <r...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> > Le jeudi 07 novembre 2013 à 10:44 +0100, Alexis Ballier a écrit :
>> >> in short: if a package requires version X then the ebuild should require
>> >> version X; it can be forgotten but it's a bug.
>> >
>> > That _is_ our policy.
>>
>> Since this thread was deemed necessary, apparently it's not.
>> Or at least not clearly stated.
>>
>
> It was not clear, and we should officially clarify it somewhere in the
> documentation.
>
> (I also learnt as a recruit that "versionless dependency is fine if all
> versions in the portage tree fulfill it". As a consequence I have been
> regularly dropping version dependencies from ebuilds for simplification if the
> excluded versions were long gone from the tree.)

For what gain? It seems to only allow breakage when updating old systems.

Reply via email to