-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/28/2013 03:00 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, heroxbd  wrote:
> 
>> I am revisiting this topic based on previous discussions[1,2,3].
> 
>> There seems to be a constant need for toolchain with a new EAPI. The
>> only block is "how can we upgrade from an ancient system?", "don't
>> bump or the upgrade path will be break". Let's figure out a solid
>> upgrade path consciously, with a test farm of ancient systems, and
>> then bump the EAPI of toolchain.
> 
> The upgrade path is not at all what is blocking this. In its 20130409
> meeting, the council has (unanimously) decided: "EAPIs 0 to 2 are no
> longer required for the upgrade path of users' systems."
> 
> The reason why toolchain packages are still at EAPI 0 was explained in
> this posting:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2369/focus=2377
> 
> AFAICS, changing that is entirely the task of the toolchain team.
> 
Yes, it is entirely the task of the toolchain team, and looks like
heroxbd joined the toolchain team and would like to push the rest of his
team for this update. Something I greatly thank him for.

I don't think any dev wants to (or really could) force toolchain to
update individually, however, if motivated people want to join the team
and help, his question appeared to be will it be permitted to be updated.

- -Zero
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=ROKo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to