On 8 September 2013 14:00, Mikle Kolyada <zlog...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi guys! > > Few days ago i was surprised, when i saw perl-5.18 unhardmasked. > So, i want ask here. > > > @Patrick, why you unmask it? You even not ack perl herd about it. It was > in the tree about two weeks, too early for unmasking, furthermore, you > added not all modules need for perl-5.18 in the tree. Now many users ask > us "why perl 5.18 broke our modules?" Its not good. Testing on three > boxes w/o problems, no major reason for unmasking. And also, many CPAN > guys still no fix own modules for compile with-5.18 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) > > iJwEAQECAAYFAlIsdO0ACgkQG9wOWsQutdat/QQAsLcbqEn6NZGFAoipWZuBCxMM > Q5BPj7a43vLEuI08aCbOeiihVWqEEVqPOWJyXAoSohkOL5DhmRfv1e6z4JPX2BGv > dH/HFBkFtWH3gVOg7BV+rvecSb/ds6M2zufjnSHfBxomAuSKiFru1lQGYoVbPOrZ > Gwpy66uY2LZ9kBNkM/Q= > =USUZ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
Hi, If you feel it should not be unmask then please mask it again. Although it might be too late for that. Moreover, I don't think raising this issue to the mailing list is appropriate as a first step. Did you try to talk to him? If you feel he violated the perl@ team policies please consider following the QA policy for such violations https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0048.html -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
