On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a > > packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to > > openrc-0.12.ebuild hitting the tree. There are details in > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481336 if anyone's interested > > in why it's happening. > > > > I've fixed the 0.12.ebuild in the tree now. It's a hack but it seems > > to be the best possible solution. > > Thanks for the update. From the other report it seems unlikely that > calling for volunteers would have turned up much. > > That's just the nature of ~arch - if you get an openrc update you're > among the first. Gentoo users should know what they're doing > regardless, and ~arch users doubly-so. > > Also, it really isn't Gentoo-specific, but putting /etc in a git repo > is a really good practice, and I'm wondering if it should go in the > handbook as a result. > > Rich > > sys-apps/etckeeper is what you want. Works great. It even has portage integration. Though I'd recommend going with the ~arch version instead of stable for that portion. -- Doug Goldstein
