On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > > > To be clear: I am not suggesting to change the meaning of stable, > I am suggesting that the latest available upstream kernel should > perhaps be the default for Gentoo users. How to make that happen > is less important, the idea to automatically mark v-s stable is > only that, an idea. :) > > > //Peter > > You seem to be ignoring the regressions that often come with new kernel releases, the very common breakage caused in stable "genkernel all", and other various complications. Unleashing brand new kernel.org sources on stable users as soon as they are released seems crazy to me. These releases surely bring more than just "the newest fixes".
Going straight to stable is (in my eyes) so far from being a viable option, that "always unstable, allow unstable if you're ok with the risk/benefit tradeoff" seems like the best bet, to me. -Ben
