On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu> wrote: > [...]
> And non-deterministic tests are stupid, useless, broken tests. Amen. Even though there is that 1% of cases in where you want to have non-deterministic tests. For instance, if you want to run the same test thousands of times and randomly pick an initial state to see if you spot a "scenario" in where you have problems (concurrency problems)... :-) > > > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes > flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ -- Fabio Erculiani
