-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/01/2013 01:35 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:20:09 -0400
> "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" <zeroch...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> Some patches are reasonably easy to combine, such as genpatches and
>> aufs.  Some patches are difficult to combine, such as hardened and *.
>> When you combine hardened patches and aufs (for example) you need
>> extra patches.  I would be THRILLED to see the number of sources cut
>> down, but hardened-sources must be it's own thing (that said, I'll
>> personally maintain the aufs patches for hardened if they wanted to
>> add a USE=aufs flag).
> 
> Yes, gave it as an quick example but I indeed remember from going
> through the sources ebuilds that hardened ebuilds do quite some things.
> I think the downside from extending genpatches is that hardened-sources
> can no longer rely on it, but we'll have to see that as we go forward.
> 
> I don't think that apart from hardened the optional patches on their own
> are hard to combine; they each have their own separate goal, I don't
> see them conflict on anything. If it happens once in a while, we can
> still maintain them to work together.

Hardened has K_WANT_GENPATCHES="base" which means it already doesn't
take the extra patches.  We could either introduce a new flag for your
patches like K_WANT_GENPATCHES="base extra geek" or more likely make
each one with their own name so that hardened et al can take what they
like and leave the rest.
> 
> Also note that I do not plan to introduce any USE flags, since that
> would duplicate the options to be listed in the kernel menuconfig.

Good point.

Thanks,
Zero
> 
>> If users want a vanilla kernel, they want vanilla-sources.  Nothing
>> about that should change.  I don't feel that it would be honest to
>> add a vanilla use flag to gentoo-sources as in no reality are those
>> vanilla.
> 
> Apart from the changes discussed on the gentoo-kernel ML, nothing else
> there will change. You can read the thread as well as the summary; if
> you disagree, you're welcome to join the discussion there.
> 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.kernel/697
> 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.kernel/697/focus=730
> 
> But yes, apart from that, vanilla-sources will give you vanilla kernel.
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=gsg9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to