On Sat, 25 May 2013 14:48:30 -0400 Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I'm wondering if we should create a more global function for calling > ninja in a consistent way. Maybe we should introduce a NINJAOPTS > variable for users to set in make.conf. Should we create a new eclass > for this, or just stick it in eutils? Is NINJAOPTS a variable recognized by ninja or something that would be Gentoo specific? It'd be nice if you could parse out what you need from MAKEOPTS instead, but I have no strong feelings. If there's only two users in the tree right now I don't think an eclass is warranted. -- Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
