On 05/25/2013 02:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 05/25/2013 05:14 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
But if a co-maintainer pushes through a change that I oppose, then
working together becomes quite difficult. In this case I opted to
give up maintainership.
Ben,
We've been working together, in the same team(s), for more than 4
years and we never had a single problem in co-maintaining packages. I
would never expected you to make so much noise because I committed a
file (yes a file, *not* a patch) that changes absolutely *nothing* to
existing users but it helps all those users who want to use systemd.
I am very disappointed and confused.
You should have known me better by now.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
We are moving too quickly on bug #448882 ([Tracker] packages not
providing systemd units). We should come to better consensus on systemd
integration and we were getting there with the idea of INSTALL_MASK. I
don't know that it is a working solution yet. I have to oppose adding
unit files unless we have a way to opt out for reasons I gave earlier,
regarding embedded systems where one needs to conserve space
aggressively. And we may have found a way to do so without cluttering
ebuilds with USE flags.
Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting
out? I can't support this initiative without such a solution and I
would be happy to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail : bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
