On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> There's value in someone being just contrarian enough to purposefully 
> look for the strangest or most illogical read of a spec and
> (initially) implement it that way, in ordered to root out and get the
> bugs in the spec fixed.  That said...

I highly doubt the person implementing the code for Paludis was doing
it in a contrarian way. As far as I can see, he simply implemented what
the spec says.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to