On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:46:14 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:

> Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted:
> > I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then push, vs
> > commit twice with cvs.
> 
> But git commits are quite lightweight, while as someone already
> pointed out, cvs commits, if done properly with repoman, are anything
> but.

Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with
the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.


      jer

Reply via email to