On 24/02/13 16:17, hasufell wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/24/2013 11:11 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 24/02/2013 11:06, Michał Górny wrote:
Then don't put 'autotools' in the name.
+1
That would be multilib-minimal.eclass then?
Sounds good to me.
ABCD also suggested something else:
autotools-multilib.eclass -> autotools-utils-multilib.eclass
This makes sense too, autotools-multilib.eclass is misleading as it
embeds the "unrelated" autotools-utils.eclass
So it seems currently that some are against this eclass, some are
against the whole idea and favour multilib-portage, some are against
using autotools-utils.eclass for this, ...
Some people are already committing the eclass version changes/fixes to
tree, some are filing bug reports about bugs caused by it, ...
It would be nice if people agreed but I guess that is not happening, so
i'll be pushing this eclass to tree under name 'multilib-minimal.eclass'
if I don't hear compelling arguments for not doing so, or in case you
push it before me
- Samuli
