-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 30/12/12 15:01, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Maybe you could suggest a nice beforehand UI for REQUIRED_USE 
> constraints.
I think this is orthogonal to the discussion. If ffmpeg had a local
description of bindist,
        # equery u ffmpeg
would output an explanation -- and I believe this is the most common
way to check USE-flags on beforehand.

>> If you happen to have the constraints satisfied for some reason,
>> you will never even get an error.
> 
> Meaning you can redistribute the binary.
Yes, but you will never be made aware of the issue.

>> Furthermore, just *why* is the constraint there? Patent
>> infringement? Licence incompatibility?
> 
> Because you can't redistribute the binary if the constraint is not 
> satisfied :)
Yes, but why not? What is it with this constraint that makes it
inherently not re-distributable unless it is satisfied?

> bindist does absolutely nothing by itself there. do you really want
> a description like "Enforces license compatibility constraints" ?
That would satisfy the *what* of a local bindist. If you are able to
satisfy the *why* as well, that would be nice.

- -- 
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
http://plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlDgS00ACgkQRtClrXBQc7X4wAD/bHYhg9f9Esya/Mr3kBqTghfY
ZTbE8q4VpLyufIfRJAgA+wUbP3B/Lt0cawxW5AyRTNst3Kcgfd6HYvn/dnlu0j4K
=Ffxa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to