I can't vote, but I think we need to soften the policy.

2012/12/26 Sergey Popov <pinkb...@gentoo.org>

> 25.12.2012 18:30, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Torsten Veller <t...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> Let's discuss the "specific guideline" for Perl modules. It's as
> follows:
> >>
> >> ,-
> http://devrel.gentoo.org/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=1#doc_chap2_sect2
> >> | Perl
> >> |
> >> | New Perl modules are to be added to portage only when one of the
> following
> >> | conditions is met:
> >> |
> >> | a) The module(s) fulfill a dependency
> >> | b) The module(s) cannot be handled by g-cpan
> >> | c) The module(s) add functionality to existing ebuilds
> >> | d) The module(s) provide tools, applications or other features (i.e.
> more
> >> |    than what their .PM offers)
> >> |
> >> | Please make sure that at least one member of the perl herders approves
> >> | your addition.
> >> `-
> >>
> >> Recently the proxy-maintainer project is repeatedly adding packages
> >> which aren't following these guideline AFAIK. So maybe we should change
> >> it.
> >>
> >> 444974 a) dev-perl/Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text
> 2012-12-07
> >> 444976 a) dev-perl/Roman - Perl module for conversion between Roman and
> Arabic numerals.        2012-12-03
> >> 446710 ?) dev-perl/FLV-AudioExtractor - Extract audio from Flash Videos
> 2012-12-12
> >> 447724 ?) dev-perl/Email-Send-Gmail - Send Messages using Gmail Mon
> 10:12
> >>
> >> Ad a): This requirement is a little problematic:
> >> Sometimes perl modules are needed for maintainer-wanted packages.
> >> Sometimes the perl modules are added to the tree while the
> >> maintainer-wanted package never are or will be. Sometimes the maintainer
> >> are waiting for the perl team to do their work.
> >>
> >> Ad b): (Judging from bugreports) g-cpan doesn't seem to be really
> >> reliable these days. I always wanted to test/verify it. But ... (random
> >> excuse: time, motivation,...)
> >>
> >> I guess I don't have no problem with modifying or dropping the
> >> requirements. The perl overlay contains hundreds of packages which
> >> should be added to the main tree.
> >>
> >> The dev-perl category currently already contains the most packages
> >> (1140 per packages.g.o).
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards
> >> Torsten
> >>
> >
> > I'm sure I skimmed that section of the handbook at some point for the
> > quizzes, but I don't remember it. I think it is possible that the
> > proxy commiter (pinkbyte) forgot about it too.
>
> No, i do not, i have read this guideline, and yes - it is not mentioned
> directly in Handbook or Devmanual.
> Some of these modules was added cause they are dependencies for other
> packages(which are still waiting for adding in tree, cause they have no
> maintainer yet), others - cause g-cpan generate very ugly ebuilds for them.
>
> > I think that all of those requirements make sense. We might want to
> > formalize a similar guideline for the python herd.
> >
> > Perhaps the requirements list could be copied somewhere more visible?
> > The perl project page might get more traffic for people looking to
> > write perl ebuilds.
> >
>
> Truly, i do not really understand such hard policy for NOT including
> perl modules in tree. I know that perl herd is understaffed, but i do
> not think that this is generally a problem, cause they do not maintain
> recently added packages, but proxy maintainers do.
>
> So, basically, yes, i vote for easing policy a bit.
>
> P.S. CCing maintainer of modules, that i have commited as a proxy, maybe
> he also wants to say something regarding this.
>
> --
> Best regards, Sergey Popov
> Gentoo Linux Developer
> Desktop-effects project lead
>
>


-- 
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=sNcj
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

Reply via email to