El mié, 26-12-2012 a las 19:46 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El mié, 26-12-2012 a las 17:14 +0000, Markos Chandras escribió: > > > > On Dec 25, 2012 8:33 PM, "Pacho Ramos" <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > # Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> (25 Dec 2012) > > > # Fails to build with libav-9 (#443238). Removal in a month. > > > media-libs/libdlna > > > media-video/ushare > > > > > This is not a valid reason to remove it. I use it every day. Please > > remove the masking. You should have contacted me first as I think I am > > on metadata (haven't checked yet) > > > > > > You were contacted at: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443238#c1 > > But no problem with dropping the mask... the only doubt, should we keep > libdlna too or drop optional ushare support for it?
+ 26 Dec 2012; Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> package.mask: + Unmask libdlna/ushare as it's still soon to kill libav-9 incompatible + packages (that is still hardmasked) +
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
