Alexis Ballier schrieb: > On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:41:05 +0100 > Thomas Sachau <to...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> If there are no objections, i plan to add E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF >> to the list of USE_EXPAND variables for x11-wm/enlightenment:0.17, in >> the next days. >> > > i doubt there will be any objection but with such information there > cant be any :)
You destroyed my plan ;-) > > - there is no x11-wm/enlightenment:0.17 in the tree This is currently in the enlightenment overlay. Since there are now alpha snapshots, i plan to add it to the main tree after doing some tests in the overlay (including the usage of the USE_EXPAND variable). > - what will be the possible values and use case of these variables ? e17 has a good amount of modules, which can be excluded at compile time. Each module has a USE flag, some examples for those USE flags: e_modules_conf-theme, e_modules_conf-wallpaper2, e_modules_ibar, e_modules_temperature > - considering gentoo generally uses e-prefixed names (econf, emake, > etc.) maybe its wiser to name the variables E17_* instead of only > E_*, or ENLIGHTENMENT_*, so that it makes the "confusion" harder. > Those functions are internal ebuild functions, while the USE_EXPANDed var is exposed to and may be used by the user, so i dont see a high risk of people mixing them. Maybe some other people can also comment on this? -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
