On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:05:58 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/23/2012 12:40 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:02:01 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> > > wrote: > > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> On 09/23/2012 11:56 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > >>>> So i would prefer some help/support with multilib-portage to > >>>> get it accepted sooner, instead of this additional workaround > >>>> for a subset of packages. > >>> > >>> I prefer the simpler solution. > >>> > >> > >> I prefer the stronger solution. This is just a quick workaround. > > > > How is it stronger? By doing implicit magic on every ebuild? > > > > a) does not involve modifying ebuilds How can you tell whether a particular ebuild does install libraries which are suitable for multilib? Or are we enforcing multilib for every single program now? > c) is tested and developed for quite some time Building packages on two ABIs was developed quite a long time ago, and was tested since. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
