On 10-09-2012 09:32:23 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > So really we should just not support prefix at all in any EAPI before > 5, and not have the whole "but define those prefix variables anyway" > hack in eclasses. But apparently people are preferring to go to great > lengths not to have to use newer EAPIs...
I think the problem is that this vision doesn't really give a migration path, even when people are willing to move on to EAPI 5. Personally, this vision doesn't really encourage me to push any changes for this, since Portage seems to handle it well. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
