On Wednesday 18 July 2012 12:18:35 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:33 PM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > "epatch" is so widely used and basic that I wonder why it's still not > > > implemented as a real helper function. > > > > Because then its harder to change, it must be in PMS, otherwise you > > have to do things like test which version of epatch the package > > manager provides....sounds a lot like EAPI :) > > You know, that's actually a pretty good case *for* base.eclass, > eutils.eclass and similar... we should probably move more functions > there... :D
i don't see how base vs eutils eclass here makes a difference -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
