On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:49:04PM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > [ snip ] > > 9) Otherwise, at very minimum, they're failing the "build udev pretty > > much the same as before" > > ./configure > make > make install > > You fail to see the matter from their POV. They don't care (that much) > about building, because the distributions they care about use binary > prebuilt packages. In that sense, "build udev pretty much the same as > before" is the holly trinity of "./configure; make; make install". > Otherwise the part about "package only what is necessary" has not that > much sense. > > Which again leads to the "please, add a virtual/udev" so the people > using systemd don't need to built udev twice.
Unless we add sys-apps/systemd to virtual/dev-manager. If we do that I don't see a need for virtual/udev. Also, I don't see how systemd users are building udev twice as it currently stands. William
pgppskv1TmSsk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
