On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 21:02 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Which is why it's policy that you check every dependent before making > changes to a package. You *do* follow that policy, and not just assume > that repoman passing means it's fine, right?
Excellent. So we are finally in agreement that one *already* needs to check every dependent before making changes to a package - in other words, that implementing my LINGUAS proposal would not change that part of the required workflow for an ebuild maintainer. It's good to see us finally agree on something :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
