On 07/08/2012 08:57 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:29:35 +0200
Pacho Ramos<pa...@gentoo.org> wrote:
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:49 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn ha scritto:
Please report a removal bug for this, so any issues concerning
users of netkit-tftp can be tracked.
Here it is:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425362
And actually Robin K. who submitted the overflow bug I fixed,
pointed out that there _are_ cases where hpa doesn't work but
netkit does, so I've downgraded the removal to a simple masking for
bad code.
I guess we'll wait a bit more before removing this, in the mean time
though I don't really feel happy with leaving it unmasked so it'll
stay as it is.
If its upstream is completely dead, it has bad code and it has a
replacement, I would still go to treeclean it
But if it provides the only means to netboot certain hardware, then you
might think twice.
jer
I have several ubiquity routerstations (the hardware in questions) and
I've asked Robin Kauffman to report the steps to reproduce in the bug.
I'll try to get to the bottom of why tftp-hpa doesn't work.
--Tony
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail : bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID : D0455535
