On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:57:53 -0700 Brian Harring <ferri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Btw, good catch on package.mask. Hhadn't thought of that, that > *will* be the most contentious point. That can be dealt w/ via > having git on portage-1 profile format so we'd have package.mask as > directories (which Ciaran will validly hate, and I won't like > due to having to write the portage-1 -> PMS translater for > rsync distribution), or coming up w/ a different way to split the > commits across multiple files, rather than a single. That doesn't like a 'lesser evil' to me. I'd rather see those few conflicts and fix them once in a while rather than having to lookup multiple package.mask files with entries split in a semi-random manner. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
