On 05/17/2012 11:00 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 05/17/2012 03:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
any complaints ? -mike
Index: profiles/base/packages
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/base/packages,v
retrieving revision 1.62 diff -u -p -r1.62 packages ---
profiles/base/packages 12 Mar 2012 09:13:37 -0000 1.62 +++
profiles/base/packages 17 May 2012 19:50:49 -0000 @@ -61,7 +61,7
@@ #*sys-devel/libtool #*sys-devel/m4 *sys-devel/make
-*sys-devel/patch +*>=sys-devel/patch-2.6.1 *sys-fs/e2fsprogs
*virtual/dev-manager *virtual/editor
What's the advantage/reward?
<patch-2.6.1 fails if patch contains DOS -line endings, like the ones
you get from some crappy pastebin services or Trac's webservice
>=patch-2.6.1 doesn't have this problem, and this is what developers
are using anyway
so less breakage, no possibility of these things slipping by
consistent behavior
profit!
- Samuli
