On 05/05/12 21:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 05/05/12 14:40, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >> >> Hiya, >> >> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of >> an >> eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the >> portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them. >> >> Suggestion: new category office-ext >> >> What do you think? > > No preference myself, but we already have e.g. app-emacs and www-apache > which (I guess?) reflect the fact that emacs lies under app-foo and > apache under www-bar. > > That would suggest app-libreoffice?
+1 on app-libreoffice if they are only for LibreOffice. Can those extensions work with app-office/openoffice-bin? -- Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xF6A80E46 desktop-misc, java, vim, kernel, python, apache...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
