On Monday 30 April 2012 13:16:52 Maxim Kammerer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 19:03, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i don't know what you mean by "OS functions", but the whole point is that > > this code *cannot* execute *any* external program by default. > > I meant calling mount(2) directly instead of executing Busybox's > "mount" applet, etc.
this was done on purpose to make maintenance much simpler, and to avoid re- implementing non-trivial things like /etc/fstab parsing > First /dev mount attempt in the code is supposed > to use /etc/fstab, but Busybox's mount options are not always > compatible with util-linux mount, so maybe that's not a good idea > anyway. i don't think it's a big deal ... busybox generally aims to be compatible with the utils it replaces, so if there's bugs/missing stuff, file a bug to get it added. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
