On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: >> On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: >>> I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for >>> use in other contexts without permission of the author. > >> Portage could be considered to be one of these contexts. > > > If the entire package is installed (ie, it's not broken up into > separate libraries or sub-packages) this would be fine (ie having the > package in portage), wouldn't it? > > I guess the primary restriction here would be that nothing else would > be allowed to link against any embedded libraries; ie, the package > couldn't be a dep. >
It simply creates one binary which I am interested in. I don't see any problem if I use fetch restriction. The only remaining question would be the actual LICENSE? justin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
