Am 15.03.2012 00:37, schrieb Greg KH: > Not really, I don't think we support systems without udev anymore, > right? And we get away with a lot of these different "options" at > compile time, which makes it easier than what Debian has to handle, so > perhaps it's not a fair comparison.
Sure Gentoo does support such systems... # equery g virtual/dev-manager * Searching for dev-manager in virtual ... * dependency graph for virtual/dev-manager-0 `-- virtual/dev-manager-0 amd64 `-- sys-fs/udev-171-r5 (sys-fs/udev) amd64 `-- sys-apps/busybox-1.19.3-r1 (sys-apps/busybox) amd64 [mdev] `-- sys-fs/devfsd-1.3.25-r9 (sys-fs/devfsd) [missing keyword] `-- sys-fs/static-dev-0.1 (sys-fs/static-dev) amd64 `-- sys-freebsd/freebsd-sbin-9.0 (sys-freebsd/freebsd-sbin) [missing keyword] [ virtual/dev-manager-0 stats: packages (6), max depth (1) ] /martin
