On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:20:08PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:07:48PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > ssmtp has been quiet project for quite a while, where as msmtp is > > maintained one. > > > > sure, ssmtp might be just mature, but msmtp is equally small and has > > more features. > > > > any thoughts? > +1 to getting rid of ssmtp. But I'm not sure that msmtp is the best > replacement. > > One of the greatest things that bugs me about ssmtp is that if the > mailserver is not available, it hangs for a while, and then it loses the > email. > > Where I need a simple mail relay, I've gone with nullmailer instead, > because it supports the features, and it explicitly has a lightweight > daemon mode that queues mail to send.
At isolated places where i don't integrate my host into an existing mail setup, i use esmtp because it allows me to do local delivery of system mails (cron or similar jobs) by using a very simple setup: ~ $ cat /etc/esmtprc mda="/usr/bin/procmail -d %T" That's about the only config i need for this. Ok, it's not perfect because it requires procmail (no setup task required though) and cannot write the files directly. I think as an initial setup, something that just does local delivery for system mails out of the box is better than something that doesn't work unless you start configuring smart relay hosts etc. You can still do this if you integrate yourself into an existing mail setup. Christian
