El lun, 27-02-2012 a las 16:06 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió:
> On 2/24/12 6:56 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > I'd like to modify eutils.eclass to only generate one command:
> >
> > # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4' && \
> > rm '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4'
>
> Given supporting comments to this thread (and totally off-topic
> zfs/btrfs discussion), I'd like to commit the patch below in 24 hours.
>
> > --- eutils.eclass.orig 2012-02-26 10:02:24.000000000 +0100
> > +++ eutils.eclass 2012-02-26 10:03:17.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -1276,16 +1276,8 @@
> > fi
> > # temp hack for #348634 #357225
> > [[ ${PN} == "mpfr" ]] && lib=${lib##*/}
> > - ewarn " # revdep-rebuild --library '${lib}'"
> > + ewarn " # revdep-rebuild --library '${lib}' && rm '${lib}'"
> > done
> > - if [[ ${notice} -eq 1 ]] ; then
> > - ewarn
> > - ewarn "Once you've finished running revdep-rebuild, it should
> > be safe to"
> > - ewarn "delete the old libraries. Here is a copy & paste for
> > the lazy:"
> > - for lib in "$@" ; do
> > - ewarn " # rm '${lib}'"
> > - done
> > - fi
> > }
> >
> > # @FUNCTION: built_with_use
> I think somebody pointed some "revdep-rebuild" versions where exiting with successful code even when failed, was fixed version stabilized?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
