On Thursday 19 January 2012 04:32:46 Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:42:14 +0100 Michael Weber wrote: > > Um, what happend to the policy to not f*** around with stable ebuilds? > > I don't think such a rule has any meaning considering that those > ebuilds are mostly contained in an eclass.
pedantically speaking, i think you're thinking of gcc. glibc is mostly contained in eblits. practically speaking, it's mostly the same, although there's a bit more control over things with eblits. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
